Posts
The Brutal Truth: Why Most Workplace Communication Training is Complete Rubbish (And What Actually Works)
Related Resources:
Look, I'm going to start with something that might ruffle a few feathers in the corporate training world. After seventeen years of running communication workshops across Australia—from mining sites in the Pilbara to boardrooms in Collins Street—I can tell you that 87% of workplace communication training is about as useful as a chocolate teapot.
There. I said it.
The problem isn't that people don't want to communicate better. Everyone does. The problem is we're teaching communication like it's a bloody university course instead of treating it like the messy, human, sometimes uncomfortable reality it actually is.
The Active Listening Myth That's Killing Real Conversations
Here's where I'm going to lose half the HR managers reading this: active listening, as it's commonly taught, is rubbish. Complete rubbish.
I watch people in my workshops nodding like dashboard dogs, making exaggerated eye contact, and parroting back everything they've just heard like some sort of corporate echo chamber. "So what I'm hearing you say is..." No. Stop it. You sound like a robot having a breakdown.
Real listening—the kind that actually builds relationships and solves problems—is messier than that. It involves interrupting sometimes. It means getting distracted and having to ask someone to repeat themselves. It's about caring more about understanding than demonstrating your textbook techniques.
I learned this the hard way during a particularly disastrous workshop I ran for a logistics company in Brisbane about eight years ago. I was so focused on teaching the "proper" active listening techniques that I completely missed the fact that half the room was zoned out because the shift supervisors were explaining problems in a way that made no sense to the warehouse staff.
The breakthrough came when one of the forklift drivers—let's call him Dave—just interrupted a supervisor mid-sentence and said, "Mate, I have no idea what you're talking about. Can you just show me?" That interruption, that "rude" break in protocol, solved more communication problems in five minutes than my two-hour active listening module had in weeks.
Why "Professional Communication" Often Isn't
Another unpopular opinion: most professional communication training teaches people to communicate less effectively, not more.
We tell people to avoid emotion. To keep things "professional." To use corporate speak that sounds impressive but says nothing. The result? Meetings where everyone nods politely while nothing gets accomplished, emails that take three paragraphs to ask a simple question, and conflicts that fester because nobody's allowed to say what they actually think.
The best communicators I know in business break these rules constantly. They show passion. They use simple language. They admit when they're confused or frustrated. They ask direct questions that cut through the nonsense.
Take Richard Branson, for instance. The man built an empire by communicating like a human being, not a corporate manual. Same with Gina Rinehart—love her or hate her, she says exactly what she means without corporate fluff.
The Real Skills Nobody Teaches
Want to know what actually makes someone a great workplace communicator? Here are the skills that matter, and I guarantee they're not in your standard training programme:
Reading the room. Not the textbook version where you notice if someone's arms are crossed. The real version where you can tell that Janet from accounting is having a rough week and maybe now isn't the time to discuss her team's performance metrics.
Knowing when to shut up. I've seen more problems solved by someone finally stopping their explanation than by continuing it. Sometimes the best communication is no communication.
Being comfortable with awkward silence. Americans hate this. Australians are actually pretty good at it, but we're losing the skill. Silence gives people time to think. Use it.
Admitting you don't know something immediately. Don't waffle. Don't redirect. Just say "I don't know, but I'll find out." Revolutionary concept, apparently.
The thing is, most communication training focuses on talking techniques when the real skill is in the thinking that happens before you open your mouth. What's the actual problem here? What does this person need from this conversation? What's the simplest way to give it to them?
The Technology Trap (And Why Slack Isn't Always the Answer)
Right, let's talk about the elephant in the digital room. Every second company I work with thinks their communication problems will be solved by better technology. More platforms! Better apps! Sophisticated project management systems!
Bollocks.
I've watched teams communicate brilliantly using nothing but a whiteboard and face-to-face meetings. I've also seen organisations with every communication tool imaginable still struggle to share basic information between departments.
The problem isn't the tools—it's that we're using sophisticated technology to avoid having straightforward conversations. Instead of walking over to someone's desk to ask a question, we send a Slack message. Instead of calling a quick meeting to sort out a problem, we create a shared document that nobody reads properly.
Technology should make communication easier, not replace it entirely. But here's the thing—and this is where I might annoy some younger workers—not everything needs to be digital. Sometimes a phone call really is faster. Sometimes you need to see someone's face to understand what they're really saying.
The Diversity Challenge Nobody Talks About Honestly
Here's where things get interesting, and where most training programmes either ignore the issue or handle it so carefully they don't say anything useful at all.
Modern Australian workplaces are incredibly diverse. We've got people from dozens of different cultural backgrounds, different generations, different education levels, all trying to work together. This is fantastic for business—diverse teams genuinely perform better—but it creates communication challenges that nobody wants to address honestly.
Different cultures have very different communication styles. Some are direct, some are indirect. Some cultures encourage interrupting and challenging ideas, others see it as deeply disrespectful. Some people grew up with formal hierarchies where you never question a supervisor, others come from environments where everyone's expected to speak up.
Most training programmes acknowledge this exists and then immediately pretend it doesn't matter. "Just be respectful to everyone!" Well, yes, obviously. But what looks like respect to someone from one background might look like indifference or even rudeness to someone from another.
The solution isn't to avoid the topic—it's to talk about it openly. In my workshops now, I spend time getting people to share their communication preferences. What's the best way to give you feedback? How do you prefer to receive instructions? When you're quiet in a meeting, does that mean you agree or disagree?
These conversations can be uncomfortable initially, but they prevent months of misunderstandings later.
What Actually Works (The Stuff Nobody Wants to Hear)
After nearly two decades of this work, here's what I've learned actually improves workplace communication:
Practice uncomfortable conversations. Not role-playing. Real conversations about real issues while you've got support. Most people avoid difficult conversations until they explode into major problems. If you're not occasionally uncomfortable in your communication practice, you're not practicing the right things.
Focus on clarity over politeness. I know this goes against everything you've been taught, but sometimes being direct is kinder than being gentle. "Your report needs significant improvements" is actually more helpful than ten minutes of softening language that obscures the message.
Develop your own style. The best communicators aren't following a script—they're being themselves, just more intentionally. If you're naturally quiet, work on being strategically quiet rather than trying to become artificially talkative. If you're naturally energetic, learn to dial it down when needed rather than suppressing it entirely.
Learn to disagree well. This is huge. Most workplace communication training teaches people to avoid conflict, but good teams need productive disagreement. Learn to challenge ideas without attacking people. Learn to be wrong gracefully. Learn to change your mind publicly.
The Feedback Revolution
Here's another area where conventional wisdom is completely backwards. We teach people to give feedback using the "sandwich method"—positive comment, criticism, positive comment. It's supposed to make feedback easier to receive.
It doesn't. It makes feedback confusing and less actionable.
The people I work with who are best at receiving feedback don't want it sugar-coated—they want it specific, timely, and actionable. They want to know exactly what to do differently next time.
The feedback sandwich method teaches people to bury important information between pleasantries. It teaches recipients to ignore everything except the criticism (because they know it's coming). It's a terrible system that makes everyone feel like they're having important conversations while actually avoiding them.
Better approach: be direct, be specific, be kind. "That presentation went well overall, but the data section was confusing. Next time, can you walk through the numbers more slowly and explain what each figure means?" Done. No sandwich required.
Where We Go From Here
Look, I'm not saying all communication training is worthless. Good programmes exist. But they're usually the ones that focus on real workplace situations, acknowledge that communication is messy and personal, and give people practice with actual challenges they face.
The programmes that work spend less time on theory and more time on practice. They create safe spaces for people to have conversations they've been avoiding. They help people understand their own communication patterns and preferences, not just memorise universal techniques.
Most importantly, they recognise that good workplace communication isn't about following rules—it's about connecting with people in ways that help everyone do their jobs better.
The irony is that the best communication often breaks the communication rules. It's personal when it should be professional. It's emotional when it should be logical. It's simple when it could be sophisticated.
Maybe that's the real lesson here. Stop trying to communicate perfectly. Start trying to communicate authentically. Your colleagues will thank you for it.
Even if your training budget won't.
Additional Reading: